Tenant screening without getting sued: criteria, consistency, and the FCRA
Screening is the highest-leverage decision a landlord makes and the easiest place to create liability. Written criteria, consistent application, and the notice the law requires.
The short version
- Write your criteria down before you see a single application — that document is your defence.
- Apply them to every applicant identically. Inconsistency is what turns a rejection into a discrimination claim.
- Rejecting someone based on a background or credit report triggers a required adverse action notice under the FCRA.
- Blanket criminal-history bans are legally risky; individualised assessment is the safer standard.
- The best predictor is boring: verified income, verified rental history, and a prior landlord who will talk.
Choosing a tenant is the highest-leverage decision in the whole business. A good tenant makes the next three years uneventful; a bad one can cost a year of rent and a five-figure legal bill. It is also the single easiest place to create liability for yourself, because the decision is subjective by nature and the law requires it not to be.
Write the criteria before you meet anyone
The protection against a discrimination claim is not good intentions; it is a written standard that predates the applicant and was applied to everyone. Draft it once, publish it with the listing, and keep a copy.
| Criterion | A defensible standard | Why this form |
|---|---|---|
| Income | Verified gross income at least 3x monthly rent | Objective, disclosed, applied uniformly |
| Credit | Minimum score, or no unresolved housing debt | State the threshold; do not eyeball the report |
| Rental history | Two years verifiable, no judgements for nonpayment | Behavioural and directly relevant |
| Employment | Verifiable, or documented assets covering the term | Accommodates retirees and the self-employed |
| Occupancy | Two per bedroom plus one, per local code | Tracks code rather than your preference |
| Criminal history | Individualised assessment of relevant recent convictions | Blanket bans invite disparate-impact claims |
Apply them identically, every time
Most fair-housing exposure is not created by an intent to discriminate. It is created by flexibility: waiving the income rule for an applicant who seemed nice, requiring a co-signer from one applicant but not another with the same file, or answering a phone enquiry differently depending on how someone sounds.
A pattern of exceptions is discoverable and it is devastating, because it establishes that the standard was not really the standard. If you want discretion, build it into the written criteria — for example, "applicants below the credit threshold may qualify with an additional deposit where permitted by state law" — so that the exception is itself a rule applied to everyone.
What the FCRA requires of you
The moment you pull a credit report, criminal background check, or eviction history from a screening company, you are using a consumer report and the FCRA applies.
Get written permission first
The applicant must authorise the report in writing before you obtain it. Keep the signed authorisation.
Use it only for the stated purpose
A report pulled to evaluate a tenancy may be used to evaluate that tenancy — not shared with other landlords or reused later.
Send an adverse action notice if it influenced a denial
If the report contributed to rejecting the applicant, charging a higher deposit, or requiring a co-signer, you owe them notice — even if the report was only one factor.
Include what the notice must contain
The screening company's name, address and phone number; a statement that the company did not make the decision and cannot explain it; and notice of the applicant's right to a free copy of the report and to dispute its accuracy.
Criminal history deserves particular caution
Blanket bans on anyone with a criminal record have been the subject of federal guidance on disparate impact, and a number of states and cities now regulate this directly — restricting how far back you may look, barring consideration of arrests without conviction, or requiring that screening happen only after a conditional offer.
The safer posture is an individualised assessment: consider the nature and gravity of the offence, how long ago it occurred, and whether it bears on the tenancy — then give the applicant a chance to provide context. Document the reasoning.
What actually predicts a good tenancy
After all the compliance machinery, the signal is unglamorous:
- 1.Verified income, confirmed from pay stubs or bank statements rather than a stated figure.
- 2.A previous landlord — ideally not the current one, who may be motivated to give a glowing reference to someone they want gone.
- 3.Consistency between the application and the documents. Discrepancies are worth more attention than any single score.
- 4.Payment behaviour on housing debt specifically. Medical collections say much less about whether rent arrives.
Ask the previous landlord two questions: did they pay on time, and would you rent to them again. The pause before the second answer is often the most informative part of the entire screening.
Keep the file
Retain applications, criteria, notes, and adverse action notices for every applicant — accepted and rejected — for the period your state requires. A complete file showing the same standard applied consistently is what makes a complaint go away early. Reconstructing your reasoning two years later, from memory, is not.
Common questions
- Can I reject someone for a low credit score?
- Generally yes, provided the threshold is part of written criteria disclosed in advance and applied to every applicant. Because the score comes from a consumer report, a rejection based on it triggers the FCRA adverse action notice requirement.
- Do I have to accept Section 8 vouchers?
- It depends on where the property is. A growing number of states and cities protect source of income, which makes refusing vouchers unlawful there. Where it is not protected, you may decline — but check carefully, since this is one of the fastest-changing areas of landlord-tenant law.
- What is an adverse action notice?
- Notice to an applicant that information in a consumer report contributed to an unfavourable decision. It must identify the screening company, state that the company did not make the decision, and inform the applicant of their right to a free copy of the report and to dispute it.
- Can I charge an application fee?
- In most states yes, though many cap it at the actual cost of screening and some require a receipt or a refund of any unused portion. A few jurisdictions prohibit them. Confirm the local rule before charging.
Stop doing this by hand
TenantsRent automates rent collection, late fees, reminders, and maintenance tickets — and keeps the timestamped record that makes all of the above hold up. $5 per unit per month.
Keep reading
Security deposits: the four rules that cause almost every lawsuit
Deposit disputes are the most common landlord-tenant case in small claims court, and most are lost on process rather than merit. The four rules that decide them.
The late rent playbook: what to do on day 1, 5, 10, and 30
A calm, repeatable process for handling late rent — what to send, when to charge a late fee, when to serve notice, and how to keep the paper trail a court will accept.